By The Franchising Law Group of Piper Rudnick
and Kenneth Franklin, Fast food franchise Developments, Inc.
The Regulation of Franchising
A series of laws have been enacted to regulate various aspects of franchising.
These laws were the result of a public policy debate that began in the
early 1970's to combat alleged abuses in franchising. These laws regulate
franchisor conduct before the sale of the fast food franchise, during
the term of the relationship and upon termination of the fast food franchise.
If a commercial relationship falls within the definition of a "fast
food franchise" as set forth in these laws, it will be subject
to a variety of legal requirements and restrictions. Failure to comply
can result in lawsuits by private parties and/or penalties, civil fines,
injunctions and even criminal prosecution by a government authority.
Federal Regulation of the Sale of Fast food franchises
At the federal level, the Federal Trade Commission issued a Trade Regulation
Rule (the "FTC Rule") on October 21, 1979, requiring disclosure
of specified categories of information to a prospective fast food franchisee.
The FTC Rule defines a prospective fast food franchisee as any person
who approaches or who is approached by the franchisor or fast food franchise
broker or any of their representatives, agents or employees for the
purpose of discussing the establishment, or possible establishment of
a fast food franchise relationship. These disclosures must be made to
a prospective fast food franchisee at the earlier of: the first personal
meeting for the purpose of discussing the sale of a fast food franchise;
or 10 business days (excluding weekends and national holidays) prior
to the execution of any fast food franchise document or the payment
of any consideration for the fast food franchise. By requiring the franchisor
to provide this information, the FTC Rule is intended to reduce the
prospective fast food franchisee's investigative costs by providing
comprehensive materials about the fast food franchise and the franchisor,
enabling the prospective fast food franchise buyer to make comparisons
with other fast food franchise offerings. A second goal of the FTC Rule
is to discourage high-pressure sales tactics and to provide the prospective
purchaser with a "cooling-off" period before returning any
signed documents or making any payments to the seller.
A first personal meeting is defined in the FTC Rule as a "face
to face" meeting between the franchisor or fast food franchise
broker, or any agents, representatives or employees, and a prospective
fast food franchisee, which is held for the purpose of discussing the
sale or possible sale of a fast food franchise. A telephone conversation
or written communications concerning a fast food franchise program with
a prospective fast food franchisee will not constitute a "first
personal meeting" under the FTC Rule. If the meeting involves only
generalized discussion, the prospective fast food franchisee's interest
in purchasing a fast food franchise or the fact that the meeting was
initiated by the franchisor's representatives will not convert the meeting
into a "first personal meeting."
The FTC Rule also requires the franchisor to deliver the completed fast
food franchise and other agreements that actually are intended to be
signed by a prospective fast food franchisee at least five business
days prior to the date such agreements are signed. Only agreements that
have been completed and are ready for the prospective fast food franchisee's
signature will satisfy the five business day rule.
Application of the FTC Rule
Only if a relationship meets all of the jurisdictional elements of a
fast food franchise will the requirements of the FTC Rule apply. These
elements are as follows:
" the offer, sale or distribution of goods, commodities or services
by a business (the "fast food franchisee");
" the identification or association of the fast food franchisee's
business with a trademark, service mark, trade name, advertising or
other commercial symbol of another person (the "franchisor");
or requirements that the fast food franchisee meet quality standards
in connection with the use of the mark or symbol;
" significant control by the franchisor over the business operation
of the fast food franchisee, or significant assistance by the franchisor
to the fast food franchisee (the FTC Rule enumerates certain controls
and assistance, any one of which will satisfy this standard, including
site approval, hours of operation, production techniques); and
" direct or indirect initial payment or commitment to make an initial
payment by the fast food franchisee to the franchisor, as a condition
of obtaining or commencing the fast food franchise operation, of $500
or more at any time before or within the first six months of the relationship.
This definition of a fast food franchise, in application, is quite broad.
Anytime payment of $500 or more is made to enter into a commercial relationship
associated with a trademark or service mark where the seller asserts
some form of control over or assistance to the business operation, a
fast food franchise within the meaning of the FTC Rule probably exists.
However, the FTC Rule does not cover pure product distribution arrangements
where the purchaser only buys good at bona fide wholesale prices for
resale.
Exemptions from the FTC Rule
Even if a commercial relationship meets the FTC Rule's definition of
a fast food franchise, the seller of the relationship may not be subject
to the FTC Rule's disclosure obligations if the commercial relationship
falls within one of the following specific exemptions to the FTC Rule:
" Fractional Fast food franchises. A fractional fast food franchise
relationship exists when an established distributor adds a fast food
franchised product line to its existing line of goods. To be exempt
from the FTC Rule, the fast food franchisee must have more than two
years' prior management experience in the same business as the fast
food franchise, and the proposed relationship must be anticipated to
represent no more than 20 percent of the dollar value of the fast food
franchisee's projected gross sales in the reasonably foreseeable future.
" Leased Departments. The FTC Rule exempts arrangements by which
an independent retailer sells goods or services from the premises of
another, larger retailer, but only if the larger retailer does not restrict
the "lessee's" sources of supply.
" Minimal Investments. The FTC Rule exempts from its disclosure
requirements sales of fast food franchises where the "initial"
required payment within six months after commencing operation of the
fast food franchised business is less than $500.
In addition to these exemptions, the FTC Rule also excludes (a) bona
fide employee-employer relationships; (b) general business partnerships;
(c) relationships created by, membership in a retailer-owned cooperative
association (for example, farmer cooperatives for the sale of farm products);
(d) relationships with testing or certification services (for example,
electronic products approved by Underwriter's Laboratories and bearing
its logo); (e) "single" trademark licensing relationships;
and (f) purely "oral" agreements. However, since some writings
are usually involved even where there is only a verbal agreement, this
last exemption is available only in rare circumstances.
In addition to the offering circular, the franchisor also must furnish
a copy of the proposed fast food franchise agreement and any other agreements
to be signed by the prospective fast food franchisee. The FTC Rule deals
only with full disclosure and does not regulate any terms of the fast
food franchise relationship. No filing or registration of the Offering
Circular need be made with the Federal Trade Commission.
The FTC Rule applies in all 50 states and is intended as a minimum level
of protection for prospective purchasers. If the protection afforded
under state law is greater in states that have adopted similar specific
fast food franchise regulations, the FTC Rule defers to state law. However,
where any portion of the state law provides less protection to a purchaser,
the corresponding portion of the FTC Rule will apply. For instance,
the FTC Rule supersedes less stringent state requirements with respect
to the "cooling-off" periods following delivery of an offering
circular (before a purchaser may sign any documents or pay any money
to the franchisor). Many states that have adopted fast food franchise
regulations require the Uniform Fast food franchise Offering Circular
disclosure format, which will be discussed later. In such states, the
FTC Rule disclosure format may not be accepted for registration.
The information contained in the Offering Circular must be updated annually,
or quarterly in the event of any material change in such areas of information
as the franchisor's business, terms of sale and obligations of the fast
food franchisee. Failure to comply with the FTC Rule may result in an
FTC action for injunction, a cease and desist order, monetary damages
and civil penalties of up to $10,000 per day. There is no federal private
right of action available to an individual for a violation of the FTC
Rule. However, the FTC may require a franchisor to repay money to the
purchaser of a fast food franchise that was sold in violation of the
FTC Rule. Further, at least one state court has taken the view that
violations of the FTC Rule constitute violations of the states' consumer
protection laws (also known as "little FTC Acts").
Federal Regulation of Business Opportunities
The FTC Rule also regulates the offer and sale of "business opportunities."
The FTC Rule was intended to correct abusive practices in business arrangements
in which the purchaser sells goods supplied by the seller through outlets
obtained by the seller. The requirements of the FTC Rule with respect
to offers and sales of business opportunities are substantially the
same as those for fast food franchises.
State Regulation of Fast food franchise Offers and Sales
Since 1971, 15 states (California, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Maryland,
Michigan, Minnesota, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South
Dakota, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin) have enacted laws regulating
the offer and sale of fast food franchises. With the exception of Michigan
and Oregon, these states require the franchisor to register the fast
food franchise offering with a designated state agency prior to the
offer and sale of fast food franchises. Oregon requires only a full
disclosure of all of relevant information relating to the fast food
franchise to the prospective fast food franchisee in advance of purchase.
The State of Michigan requires disclosure complying with its statute,
as well as the filing of a notice of the franchisor's intent to offer
and sell fast food franchises in the state. In most instances, the registration
process involves administrative review of the required disclosure materials.
If the examiner is satisfied that (1) the required disclosure format
has been used (i.e., that all required categories of information have
been covered and all questions answered; the examiner makes no determination
regarding the inclusion of all relevant information or the accuracy
of the information contained in the disclosure materials) and (2) that
the franchisor has sufficient financial capacity to offer fast food
franchises in the state (or is willing to escrow or defer collection
of initial fees and other payments due from the fast food franchisee
until the fast food franchisee's business is in operation), the franchisor
will usually secure registration in that state to offer and sell fast
food franchises. Occasionally, a state administrative agency will deny
registration due to the precarious financial condition of the franchisor
or the background of its principal managers.
The disclosure statement that a franchisor must prepare for filing in
the states that have laws regulating the offer and sale of fast food
franchises is the Uniform Fast food franchise Offering Circular. All
fast food franchise registration states accept an offering circular
prepared in accordance with the Guidelines for Preparation of a Uniform
Fast food franchise Offering Circular promulgated by the North American
Securities Administrators Association ("NASAA") on April 25,
1993. This Offering Circular, known as the "UFOC format" calls
for the same basic information as an FTC Format offering circular. However,
the UFOC format is more comprehensive and a significantly different
format, and is an accepted alternative form of disclosure document under
the FTC Rule. Most of the fast food franchise registration states have
requirements in their laws and regulations requiring that minor modifications
be made to the UFOC format circular and that an addendum be prepared
containing certain state-specific information.
Registration does not indicate that the offering circular has been approved
by the state or that the offering circular has been prepared in compliance
with the relevant guidelines. Further, registration does not act as
a bar to a fast food franchisee or the state later bringing an action
against a franchisor based on information contained in or omitted from
its offering circular.
Like the FTC Rule, each state fast food franchise disclosure law defines
a "fast food franchise." Although the state law definitions
are not uniform, for state law purposes, a fast food franchise generally
will be deemed to exist when a business relationship contains all of
the following elements:
" a contract or agreement, which can be express or implied or oral
or written (note that an oral fast food franchise relationship, even
though exempt from the FTC Rule, may still be regulated by state law);
" between two or more persons;
" by which a fast food franchisee is granted the right to engage
in the business of offering, selling or distributing goods or services
under a marketing plan or system prescribed or suggested in substantial
part by the franchisor (a few states substitute the concept of a community
of interest in the marketing of goods and services for the marketing
plan element of the definition);
" the operation of the fast food franchisee's business pursuant
to such plan or system is substantially associated with the franchisor's
trademark, service mark, trade name, logotype, advertising or other
commercial symbol designating the franchisor or its affiliate; and
" the person granted the right to engage in such business is required
to pay something of value (e.g., cash, notes or property) in order to
establish the relationship, which would constitute a fast food franchise
fee.
Caution must be exercised in concluding that a particular commercial
relationship is not considered a "fast food franchise" merely
because it is not called a fast food franchise or does not require payment
of a formal fast food franchise fee. Any money paid to a seller of a
business relationship will be considered a fast food franchise fee unless
it can be proven otherwise. As previously mentioned under the discussion
of the FTC Rule, a pure distributorship arrangement, where the distributor
buys only a commercially reasonable quantity of inventory of tangible
goods at bona fide wholesale prices, will not be considered a fast food
franchise relationship under most state statutes or the FTC Rule.
Each of the state fast food franchise registration statutes has a provision
exempting certain types of fast food franchises from some or all of
its requirements. These exemptions usually apply only to the registration
and disclosure requirements of the statutes. As a result, an exempt
franchisor may still be subject to the disclosure, antifraud and unfair
or prohibited practices provisions of the state law. Furthermore, a
franchisor may meet the criteria for a state exemption, but not be eligible
for an exemption from the FTC Rule. Nevertheless, exemptions from registration/disclosure
statutes may free the franchisor from the expense and delay of review
by a state administrator.
The most common exemptions are for the following:
" franchisors having a substantial net worth ($5 million or more)
and significant franchising experience;
" fast food franchisees who sell fast food franchises for their
own account;
" transactions with existing fast food franchisees (such as extensions
or renewals);
" transactions by judicial officers (such as a sheriff or the executor
of an estate) and financial institutions (such as a bank or an insurance
company);
" fast food franchises in which the fast food franchised fee falls
below a specified threshold;
" a fractional fast food franchise exemption (similar to the FTC
rule exemption for fractional fast food franchises);
" bank credit card plans;
" up to one or two offers of a fast food franchise and/or a single
fast food franchise sale (e.g., the grant of a single fast food franchise
for the entire state); and
" transactions that the state considers to be outside the purposes
of the fast food franchise registration statute and that do not need
to be regulated in order to protect investors.
Although these exemptions are common to many of the registration states,
each state statute is unique and must be examined carefully before relying
on an exemption provision. Furthermore, several states have specific
procedures that must be followed to obtain certain exemptions, as well
as procedures for the revocation of exemptions. For example, the franchisor
may have to file an offering circular or other documents for the state's
review to obtain an exemption. Further, an exemption under a state law
does not extend to the FTC Rule, unless the relationship is also exempt
under the FTC Rule on the same or a different basis.
As is the case under the FTC Rule, a franchisor must update its offering
circular to reflect any material changes in the information contained
in the circular or the occurrence of events that need to be disclosed
to prospective fast food franchise buyers, including changes relating
to the financial condition of the franchisor, fees paid by the fast
food franchisee, litigation of the franchisor and others. The regulatory
states require that any material change in the fast food franchised
program or the franchisor's financial condition be reflected in the
offering circular within a "reasonable time" after such material
change occurs and that the changes to the offering circular be filed
with the state. Some states will require suspension of sales activity
during the time in which an amendment to the offering circular is being
processed by the administrator.
Failure to comply with state fast food franchise disclosure regulation
may result in a variety of adverse consequences, including not only
civil suits by injured private purchasers of a fast food franchise,
but also civil fines and criminal prosecution. These penalties may be
imposed on officers, directors, employees, salespersons and fast food
franchise sales brokers who participated in an illegal sale.
State Regulation of the Fast food franchise Relationship
In addition to the regulation of the offer and sale of fast food franchises,
another body of state fast food franchise regulation has emerged in
recent years in reaction to fast food franchisee claims of unfair or
discriminatory treatment. Legislation has been adopted by about 20 states
dealing with such aspects of the fast food franchise relationship as
(1) establishing good cause grounds and prior written notice procedures
for termination and nonrenewal of fast food franchises; (2) limiting
the right of a franchisor to restrict transfers of fast food franchises;
(3) prohibiting discrimination among fast food franchisees in charges
for fees and in the sale of goods and service; (4) protecting fast food
franchisees from the placement of additional franchisor or fast food
franchisee owned outlets in a fast food franchisee's market that diminishes
the fast food franchisee's revenue and profit; and (5) limiting the
right of a franchisor to restrict the sources of supply from which a
fast food franchisee buys the operating assets, goods and supplies required
for the development and operation of its business. These statutes specifically
override the express contractual language of the fast food franchise
agreement and impose their own standards upon the fast food franchise
relationship. Among the most notorious of these laws is the Iowa Fast
food franchise Relationship Act, enacted in 1992 and substantially amended
in 1995, and the much older Wisconsin Fair Dealership Act, which has
generated hundreds of lawsuits.
State Regulation of Business Opportunities
Twenty-two states (California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Indiana,
Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Nebraska, New
Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota,
Texas, Utah, Virginia and Washington) have adopted business opportunity
laws that regulate the offer and sale of certain commercial relationships.
While these laws were initially intended to regulate particular types
of distribution arrangements, the lack of clarity and uniformity in
the definitions of a "business opportunity" has resulted in
coverage of fast food franchise offerings as well.
The vast majority of the business opportunity laws require disclosures
similar to those required for fast food franchise sales. However, most
of these laws require only payment of a fee and filing with the state
administrator, who typically gives little or no review to the filed
offering circular. State business opportunity laws also may impose specific
bonding or other financial responsibility requirements, irrespective
of the franchisor's financial condition. Some of the administrators
of state business opportunity laws issue an advertising number, which
the business opportunity seller must place on all advertising within
the state as proof of registration.
Due to the varied purposes of these state laws, the definitions of business
opportunity relationships also vary widely. However, the most common
definition of a business opportunity is the sale or lease of any product,
equipment, supplies or services to a purchaser upon payment of any consideration
for the purpose of enabling the purchaser to start a business, and in
which the seller makes one or more of the following representations:
" the seller will provide or assist the purchaser in finding locations
for the use or operation of vending machines, racks, display cases or
other similar devices or currency-operated amusement machines or devices
on premises neither owned nor leased by the purchaser or seller;
" the seller will purchase any or all products made, produced,
fabricated, grown, bred or modified by the purchaser using in whole
or in part the supplies, services or chattels sold to the purchaser;
" the seller guarantees that the purchaser will derive income from
the business opportunity or that the seller will refund all or part
of the price paid for the business opportunity or any of the products,
equipment, supplies or chattels supplied by the seller if the purchaser
is unsatisfied with the business opportunity; or
" upon payment by the purchaser of a fee or sum of money to the
seller, the seller will provide a sales or marketing program that will
enable the purchaser to derive income in excess of the price paid for
the marketing plan.
The third and fourth paragraphs of the definition are of greatest concern
to franchisors, particularly those who make earnings claims to fast
food franchisees. If earnings claims are made, this may constitute a
"guarantee" for purposes of the business opportunity laws.
Even if no earnings claims are made, the franchisor still risks classification
as a business opportunity. In any fast food franchise sale, the franchisor
makes, at a minimum, an implied representation that the fast food franchisee
will derive income. The entire fast food franchise package that is presented
to a prospective fast food franchisee often implies that the fast food
franchisee will derive profit in excess of his initial fee, and therefore
may amount to a representation that the marketing program will enable
the purchaser to derive income exceeding the price paid. There does
not appear to be any judicial interpretation of these elements of the
business opportunity definition. Consequently, it is imperative that
companies operating in business opportunity states carefully review
their programs with counsel to determine whether compliance is required.
Exemptions from Business Opportunity Requirements
Business opportunity laws also exempt certain types of distribution
arrangements. Among typical business formats exempted under the business
opportunity laws are:
" A sales or marketing program sold in connection with a federally
registered trademark or service mark.
" A sales or marketing program sold in connection with the licensing
of a "registered trademark." Fast food franchise law experts
are divided as to whether state trademark registration of the franchisor's
mark, in the absence of a federal trademark registration, will qualify
for this exemption. Several business opportunity states have adopted
the informal position that a "registered trademark" requires
a federal registration. The franchisor should carefully investigate
this issue before relying on this exemption.
" Business relationships that are subject to the FTC Rule. The
franchisor that complies with the FTC Rule may be exempt from the requirements
of a state business opportunity law.
Other exemptions may exist for specific industries, experienced sellers
or buyers, sales of ongoing businesses, renewals or extensions, employer/employee
relationships and general business partnerships. Under the business
opportunity statutes of Texas, Kentucky and Nebraska, franchisors satisfying
the states' exemptions must file a one-time notice of exemption (along
with the appropriate fee) before fast food franchises can be sold in
these states. In the states of Florida and Utah, annual exemption notices
must be filed to maintain the states' exemptions.
What Is An Offer?
When a franchisor in a state without fast food franchise or business
opportunity laws deals with a state that also has no such laws, only
the requirements of the FTC Rule with respect to delivery of an offering
circular to the prospective purchaser apply. However, when dealing with
state fast food franchise and business opportunity registration laws,
the critical principle to remember is that the state law must be complied
with prior to any offer or sale of a fast food franchise or a business
opportunity in the state. In addition, should the franchisor be located
within a state with a fast food franchise registration/disclosure law,
the franchisor generally will be required to secure effective registration
in its home state before offering, or selling fast food franchises anywhere.
As a result, it is important to understand what type of franchisor sales
activity constitutes an "offer."
Although most state statutes contain a definition of an "offer,"
they generally are unclear as to what presale conduct by the franchisor
does and does not constitute an offer. Typically, an offer is defined
as "every attempt to offer, dispose of, or solicit an offer to
buy a fast food franchise." Because state regulations construe
this definition broadly, almost any contact with a prospective fast
food franchisee could be characterized as an offer. In some states,
simply mailing a brochure describing a fast food franchise network to
a prospective fast food franchisee in another state may constitute an
offer of a fast food franchise.
Certain discussions may be conducted between the franchisor and a potential
fast food franchisee without triggering state registration/disclosure
laws. It is theoretically possible for the franchisor and prospective
fast food franchisee to discuss the fast food franchise network generally
without the franchisor being deemed to have made an offer, but it is
imperative that no terms of the actual sale be referred to during the
discussions. As a practical matter, such contacts are not advisable.
A state may take the view that the franchisor's communications were
specific enough to be considered an offer, and the penalties for making
an offer of an unregistered fast food franchise can be severe. Any mention
of initial fees, royalties, potential earnings or costs associated with
the start-up of the fast food franchise will bring the discussion within
the meaning of an "offer." If the franchisor engages in such
discussions with a fast food franchisee who is protected by a state
registration law and the franchisor is not validly registered, its conduct
could be illegal.
Theoretically, the franchisor may disseminate information to prospective
buyers through the mail without triggering state disclosure or registration
provisions. These materials may include only general information about
the network, and must not refer to the terms of a sale. However, this
activity prior to registration is risky and not advisable since an administrator
may characterize even limited information as an offer. Further, such
materials may be considered advertising and require filing with a state
fast food franchise administrator prior to dissemination to the public.
If the franchisor undertakes this risk, it must, at a minimum, conspicuously
label the materials as intended as general information and not as an
advertisement or an offer to sell a fast food franchise.
Several statutes exclude certain activities from the definition of an
offer. For example, most states provide that an offer made through advertising
during a television or radio program originating out of state is not
an offer for purposes of the statute. Additionally, an exemption exists
in most states for the advertisement of a fast food franchise in a newspaper
circulated within the state, provided that two-thirds of the newspaper's
circulation occurred outside of the state during the last 12-month period.
The franchisor should be aware, however, that, absent a prior registration
or exemption, placing advertising for the sale of fast food franchises
in a state requiring registration of fast food franchise offers will
constitute an illegal offer.
To assure that its conduct complies with state law, the franchisor should
do the following prior to advertising for, or engaging in, any substantive
discussions about the fast food franchise with a prospective fast food
franchisee:
" If the franchisor is headquartered in a state that has enacted
a fast food franchise registration or business opportunity law that
applies to the franchisor's program, the franchisor must register the
fast food franchise in its home state.
" For each prospective fast food franchisee, the franchisor must
determine the fast food franchisee's state of residence, the state in
which the offer of the fast food franchise will be made, where the offer
will be accepted, and where the fast food franchised business will be
conducted. If any of these states have registration laws with which
the franchisor has not complied, the franchisor should consult legal
counsel as to the application of such laws. If the laws apply, registration
in those states must precede any sales activities.
A franchisor planning to offer and sell fast food franchises in a registration
state is required to file with the state its proposed offering circular,
certain application materials and a fee. Initial application fees currently
range from $50 to $750. Also, the franchisor will usually be required
to make certain changes or additional disclosures in its offering circular
to comply with nonuniform requirements of that state. As a general rule,
these changes relate to notice of default prior to termination, good
cause for termination, the enforceability of post-termination covenants
and jurisdiction and venue provisions. Only in rare circumstances will
the state administrator object on the ground of fairness to particular
terms of the fast food franchise agreement and require modification
of the agreement. However, several states take the position that they
have the power to do so if the state administrator finds some aspect
of the fast food franchise particularly unfair or prejudicial to the
fast food franchisee.
The degree to which administrators review the adequacy of fast food
franchise offering circulars varies widely from state to state, and
even within a state, depending on the particular fast food franchise
examiner. Factors that affect the review process include the length
of time the franchisor has offered and sold fast food franchises, whether
the state knows of any prior fast food franchise law violations by the
franchisor, whether the offering circular has been prepared by legal
counsel known to the state administrator's staff and the franchisor's
general reputation. Most initial fast food franchise registrations receive
at least one comment letter from the state, generally including requests
for changes to the offering circular, questions, requests for disclosure
of additional information and other concerns of the administrator. After
all of the administrator's concerns and requests have been satisfied
through compliance or negotiation, the administrator will grant effective
registration. This procedure usually takes from two to six weeks, but
could take as long as six months, depending upon the quality of the
offering circular initially submitted to the state and the workload
of the administrator's office.
State registration requirements delay a franchisor's expansion plans,
and cause the franchisor to incur legal costs and filing expenses. Changes
required by individual states may result in several different forms
of offering circular, some of which may conflict. As a result, considerable
time and expense may be involved in maintaining state registrations
and state specific offering circulars.
From a legal perspective, however, registration with the states can
result in benefits. The fast food franchise administrator generally
is also the state enforcement officer, and an administrator's resolution
of various issues relating to the fast food franchise offering can give
the franchisor some degree of comfort that the offering circular complies
with state law. The administrator's interpretation also may be binding
upon the state in any subsequent enforcement proceeding. Unfortunately,
opinions or interpretations of state administrators may not be binding
upon private parties suing under state fast food franchise laws.
The disclosure requirements of the FTC Rule and various state laws also
impose certain burdens upon the franchisor relating to its financial
condition. These burdens take two forms. First, the offering circular
requires disclosure of the franchisor's financial statements, the preparation
and/or auditing of which may be costly and time-consuming. Second, most
state fast food franchise law administrators will review a franchisor's
financial condition prior to allowing the franchisor to offer or sell
fast food franchises and may require, as a condition of registration
of the fast food franchise offer, the escrow or deferral of collection
of initial fees and other payments by the fast food franchisee until
the fast food franchisee's business is in operation.
Financial Statement Requirements
The FTC format circular must include the franchisor's audited financial
statements for three previous years in which the franchisor has been
in business (the audit may be qualified). The FTC Rule, however, prescribes
a procedure under which the Franchisor may commence sales with audits
being phased in over a three-year period. The UFOC format requires audited
balance sheets for a period of two years and a statement of operations,
stockholder's equity and cash flows for a three year period. The UFOC
format allows for a waiver of this requirement, in the discretion of
each state administrator, only if the franchisor has never previously
had an audit. If the franchisor does not have audited financial statements,
it may substitute the audited financial statements of its parent company
if the parent company guarantees the franchisor's performance under
the fast food franchise agreement.
If the franchisor is new and has no parent company willing to guarantee
its obligations, it may establish a subsidiary (or its parent company
could establish another subsidiary) that would prepare an audited opening
balance sheet, or audited statements for the period it has been in business.
If neither the franchisor nor the guaranteeing parent company has audited
financial statements, the franchisor or its parent company will have
to incur the expense of having its financial statements audited for
the prior three years or forego franchising in the registration states
that do not accept the FTC format offering circular.
Amending Registrations and Offering Circulars
To ensure that the offering circular contains accurate and timely information
for the fast food franchisee, the FTC Rule requires that it be revised
within 90 days after the end of the Franchisor's fiscal year and updated
on a quarterly basis to reflect any "material changes." Although
the FTC Rule requires only quarterly updates, the franchisor may elect
to do so more frequently. This may become necessary where accurate oral
representations are being made that may be contrary to outdated information
contained in the offering circular.
The FTC Rule's annual and quarterly updating requirement does not apply
if the franchisor complies with the FTC Rule by using a UFOC format
that is registered in any state. In such case, the FTC Rule's updating
requirements will be satisfied if the UFOC format is renewed or amended
in accordance with state law in the states in which the franchisor is
registered.
Renewal under state law ordinarily is required on an annual basis. A
few states require, instead of renewal, that an annual report be made
within 120 days of the franchisor's fiscal year end. Each renewal or
annual report requires the preparation of an updated offering circular
and current financial statements. This newly submitted data is subject
to the same review by the regulatory states as the initial UFOC filing
and registration.
Failure to initiate the process of renewal in a timely fashion may result
in a gap between the date of expiration of the existing registration
and the effective date of the succeeding registration. During this interim
period, the franchisor cannot offer or sell fast food franchises within
the regulatory state without violating its laws. Therefore, it is necessary
to maintain a log and a tickler system for initiating renewals and annual
reports in a timely manner.
Amendments under state registration laws must be made within a "reasonable
time" after the occurrence of a material change. A franchisor must,
therefore, amend its offering circular and registrations in the event
of a material change in the information contained in the offering circular,
or the occurrence of an event that requires the addition of information
to the offering circular. A reasonable time is generally thought to
be within 30 days after the material change occurs.
Disclosure Regulation Compliance Programs
A franchisor must develop and implement an effective disclosure regulation
compliance program to protect itself and its fast food franchise network.
An effective compliance program will help a franchisor to avoid disclosure
law violations and related "costs." These costs include payment
of damages and rescission of fast food franchises sold to fast food
franchisees who assert violations of offering circular delivery requirements,
attorneys fees' paid to defend the franchisor, payment of the fast food
franchisee's attorney's fees, civil fines and possibly criminal liability.
In addition, there are many intangible costs of litigation including
the time spent by the franchisor's employees and disruption to the franchisor's
organization.
An effective compliance program provides the mechanism by which the
franchisor can maintain evidence of compliance. Extensive documentary
evidence may be critical in defending claims of fast food franchise
sales regulation violations. Franchisors cannot take the chance of relying
on verbal testimony of employees, especially years after the occurrence.
As time passes memories fade, or at the time of trial a key employee
may be unavailable or unfriendly to the franchisor. Furthermore, verbal
testimony of the franchisor may be insufficient to overcome jury sympathy
for the fast food franchisee, especially where the fast food franchisee
has documentation that supports a claim. Records established in the
ordinary course of business are essential to bolster employee testimony.
How does a franchisor establish an effective compliance program? The
first element in developing a compliance program is determining the
assignment of responsibility for compliance. Smaller franchisors tend
to lodge this responsibility with outside counsel. Outside counsel should
be selected carefully to insure that attorneys have compliance expertise
and that the law firm has multiple attorneys that can handle questions
and problems in the event of the absence of the primary attorney. Franchisors
sometimes fail to establish an effective liaison between outside counsel
and company personnel with responsibility for keeping disclosure information
current and communicating with sales personnel. To do effective work,
outside counsel must have a source of timely, complete and reliable
information from the franchisor and a responsible manager to whom counsel
can communicate compliance status and procedures.
Some franchisors attempt to implement a compliance program by assigning
responsibility exclusively to a paralegal or a person without legal
training. This approach contains a high risk of error, because effective
compliance frequently involves legal analysis and factual evaluation
that may be beyond the competence of paralegals and persons without
legal training. In addition, such persons often do not have the internal
"clout" to get things done or insist upon full compliance.
Franchisors with small legal departments may divide responsibility for
disclosure compliance between their legal department and outside counsel.
This is a problem only if the responsibilities are not clearly parceled
out. Therefore, it is essential to establish a smooth working relationship
between the legal department and outside counsel. Franchisors with larger
legal departments typically delegate compliance responsibility exclusively
to their legal departments. Both types of delegation can work effectively,
provided that assignments are clear, the legal department has sufficient
resources and exercises independent judgment, the opinions of the legal
department are respected by management and disclosure regulation compliance
has equal priority with other legal services performed by the legal
department.
Whether compliance is delegated to outside counsel, the legal department,
or both, it is important to delegate executive responsibility to a compliance
officer whose perspective is broader than simply selling fast food franchises.
Sales personnel can view lawyers as interposing rules of sales conduct
which are designed to inhibit sales. Sales personnel are less likely
to be uncooperative with a senior executive. The lawyers and paralegals
assigned to disclosure compliance must have extensive knowledge of disclosure
regulation and the sources of essential information within the franchisor.
In addition, there must be regular communication among the compliance
officer, sales department and the legal department and/or outside counsel.
A second element found in an effective disclosure compliance program
is the establishment of systems and operating procedures. Systems and
operating procedures should be designed to effectively and timely implement
registrations; renewals of registrations; amendments to registrations
and offering circulars; sales personnel training; offering circular
and document delivery; recording information relating to offers and
sales of fast food franchises; storage and retrieval of offering circulars,
receipts for offering circulars, fast food franchise and other agreements
and sales information; and documenting fast food franchisee defaults.
Systems and procedures must be designed to create and preserve evidence
that will enable the franchisor's personnel to demonstrate compliance.
It is not sufficient to comply with the disclosure laws -- it is also
necessary to be able to prove compliance. Information must be gathered
in a central place (i.e., the franchisor's home office). All regional
personnel should be instructed to transmit specified information to
this location. Potential problems are obvious when files are incomplete
or poorly organized. When we perform compliance audits, we frequently
find document and information storage and retrieval systems that are
materially deficient.
There are no clearly delineated rules to guide a franchisor to always
accomplish full disclosure. However, if franchisors are guided by the
general standard of materiality, they will be right (and relatively
safe) must of the time. That general standard is that a franchisor must
disclose all information which could have a significant influence on
the investment decision of a reasonable prospective fast food franchise
buyer. Under the standard, franchisors must disclose some warts and
blemishes and these disclosure may result in lost sales. The alternative
is significant legal exposure. It is better to lose a sale rather than
have an infirm relationship with a fast food franchisee because the
sale of the fast food franchise did not comply with the applicable law.
If a fast food franchisee becomes unhappy with his decision to buy a
fast food franchise, he may claim that the failure to disclose "material"
information induced the purchase of the fast food franchise when in
reality it had no impact on the fast food franchisee's decision to purchase
the fast food franchise.
Most franchisors do not include historical or projected sales or profits
of fast food franchised businesses ("earnings claims") in
their offering circulars due to the concern that they will be unable
to satisfy the burden of substantiation. Many franchisors candidly admit
that it is difficult, if not impossible, to close a fast food franchise
sale without responding to questions from the prospective fast food
franchisee regarding sales and profits. Directing the prospective fast
food franchisee to talk to existing fast food franchisees often is not
sufficient. Existing fast food franchisees may not be willing to take
the time to answer all of a prospect's questions. Fast food franchisees
may consider this information private. Furthermore, start-up franchisors
have no fast food franchisees with which prospective fast food franchisees
can talk about the fast food franchise program. After one or two years
of franchising, most franchisors can make and substantiate some type
of earnings claim, even if it is limited to the gross sales of existing
fast food franchised and franchisor operated outlets. The omission of
earnings claims from the offering circular can leave this element of
fast food franchise sales open to unauthorized statements by salespersons.
Therefore even a limited claim, coupled with a statement that it is
the only authorized claim, is a check on embellishment by sales personnel
and may weaken a fast food franchisee's claim of reliance upon alleged
claims by sales personnel.
A franchisor must also establish a procedure for disposition of inquiries
from states in which the franchisor is not registered. The franchisor
must determine which state laws are applicable by checking where the
fast food franchisee and its partners or shareholders are domiciled
and where the fast food franchise is to be located. The franchisor should
avoid sending offering circulars or other materials constituting an
offer of a fast food franchise into a state where the franchisor is
not registered. It is permissible, however, to describe the franchisor's
intent and status regarding registration and projected date of follow-up
contact. However, a franchisor should not send advertisements into a
state where the franchisor is not registered. Such conduct constitutes
an illegal offer.
A franchisor must also develop procedures for evaluating developments
and amending registrations and offering circulars to reflect material
changes. The compliance officer must engage in regular communication
with the legal department or outside counsel and focus on such sensitive
areas as litigation developments, increases in costs of developing the
fast food franchised business and adverse changes in the franchisor's
financial performance or condition. In addition, a system must be established
to determine the compliance requirements applicable to fast food franchise
transfers. A transfer involving an existing agreement is often an exempt
transaction if the franchisor is not significantly involved in the transfer.
Approval of the transferee by the franchisor is not considered significant
involvement. However, if the franchisor requires the transferee to sign
the "then current" form of fast food franchise agreement or
"brokers" the transaction, the transaction will not be protected
by the exemption for intrafast food franchisee transfers.
The compliance officer should debrief all prospective fast food franchisees
before execution of documents to determine if unauthorized statements
or promises were made to them by overzealous salespersons and whether
sales personnel are complying with franchisor policies relative to disclosure
regulation compliance.
Sales personnel should be carefully interviewed when hired and background
checks should be conducted to determine whether they have been involved
in criminal or civil cases, bankruptcy proceedings or illegal sales
practices in prior employment positions. Salespersons should have an
understanding of fast food franchise sales regulation and should display
a positive attitude toward compliance with regulation. Systems and procedures
should include a disclosure regulation compliance training program for
sales personnel. A franchisor should develop checklist type forms for
sales personnel to complete during the sales process and these documents
should be created routinely in the ordinary course of business.
When developing advertising materials franchisors should avoid prohibited
claims and misleading statements. No advertisement should contain an
explicit or implicit statement that the purchase of the fast food franchise
is "risk free" or a "safe" investment or state that
profits are assured or that losses are unlikely. Advertisements should
not create unrealistic expectations by fast food franchisees. A franchisor
should avoid communicating unrealistic expectations relative to the
efforts and time that the fast food franchisee must put forth to make
his business successful. In addition, a franchisor should avoid excessive
claims relative to services to be performed by the franchisor or the
progress of the franchisor's network or the franchisor's capability.
These claims may cause the fast food franchisee to distrust the franchisor
or be disappointed in the fast food franchise, if it does not meet the
fast food franchisee's unrealistic expectations.
The compliance officer, with the assistance of legal counsel, must also
monitor changes in regulation of fast food franchise offers and sales
by identifying the sources of change (i.e., statutes, regulations, administrative
policies or judicial decisions) and consider the impact of these changes
on the fast food franchise sales program. The compliance officer must
stay abreast of such changes to insure that the franchisor stays in
compliance with fast food franchise sales regulation, which is modified
from time to time.
Effectively Documented Relationships
A successful franchisor usually has developed a well organized, complete
and understandable fast food franchise agreement. Though most fast food
franchise agreements are written in the traditional third person format
(e.g., the parties are referred to as "Franchisor" and "Fast
food franchisee"), a growing number of fast food franchise agreements
are being drafted in the less formal first person (i.e., the franchisor
is referred to as "we" and "us" and the fast food
franchisee is referred to as "you"). A first person document
is more readable and less intimidating than the traditional third person
format. A fast food franchise agreement drafted in the first person
is no less a binding and enforceable contract.
In addition to a less formal style of fast food franchise agreement,
franchisors should carefully consider other means to simplify their
agreements. Good organization and simple, short sentences are both helpful.
In addition, including in the agreement only the essential elements
of the fast food franchise relationship, and essential legal and procedural
matters, contributes to a simple, user friendly document. The operations
manual is the proper location for specifications, standards and operating
procedures ("system standards") that describe and prescribe
the operating and management systems of the franchisor's business. As
noted above, the fast food franchise agreement should give the franchisor
the right to prescribe and modify system standards, incorporate them
by reference into the fast food franchise agreement and provide that
a fast food franchisee's failure to comply with one or more system standards,
after notice and a reasonable opportunity to cure, is grounds for termination
of the fast food franchise agreement.
Most franchisors utilize collateral documents to supplement the fast
food franchise agreement. These may include subleases, collateral lease
assignments, financing documents, rights of first refusal for additional
fast food franchises and software license agreements. The admonition
to draft a well organized and readily understandable fast food franchise
agreement applies equally to such collateral documents.
The operations manual should also be "user friendly." It must
be well organized and simply written so as to be understandable not
only to the fast food franchisee but also to the managers of the fast
food franchisee's business. Writing a complete, well organized and readily
understandable operations manual is more difficult than it might seem
and requires good communications skills. The franchisor is, of course,
the best source for the content of its operations manual, but a communications
professional is usually the preferred resource for the organization
and style of the operations manual.
The third document required in every fast food franchised network is
the offering circular. Virtually all franchisors use the Uniform Fast
food franchise Offering Circular (UFOC) disclosure format prescribed
by the North American Securities Administrators Association, which is
discussed above. The UFOC rules require offering circulars to be written
in "plain English," and to avoid legal terminology and the
passive voice. Some state fast food franchise law administrators interpret
these rules to greatly limit the franchisor's choice of expression to
communicate information about the franchisor and the fast food franchise
it offers. Franchisors are rewriting their offering circulars to comply.
Compliance is best achieved, and the circular is made a better communications
device, if a circular is written in the first person format and utilizes
simple and short sentences.
Part
I: Introduction to Franchising
Part II: In What Ways
Is Franchising A Superior Expansion Method?
Part III: When Is A Company
Ready To Franchise?
Part IV: Buying A Fast Food
Franchise
Part V: Elements Of
Successful Franchising
Home Terms
of use Privacy
Policy Contact
Us